Comments on: The Bogman Pt. II

By: Sarah

Sarah — Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:18:28 +0000

“like a shiny, brick shaped, torpedo.” And just as aerodynamic from the looks of it.

Another great one. Can I have some more, please?

By: Neil Struthers

Neil Struthers — Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:28:44 +0000

You can never have too many mouths.

By: Donal

Donal — Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:26:54 +0000

This is what I get for shoving up an unfinished piece.

Dublin sacks are indeed a rare breed. Filthy within and without, they are known to house all manner of terrible, terrible things. Things with too many eyes, things with too many mouths. Deadly things.

By: TadMack

TadMack — Fri, 27 Oct 2006 06:25:19 +0000

Well, I’m with you, Elimare…
The Lowry Longseach lost me… but I do worry about various things in Dublin in sacks…

By: Donal

Donal — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:21:32 +0000

Meowww. Sounds like someone has a case of the pre 900th birthday ‘a bee crawled up my ass and died’ blues.

Guess you’ll have to read the rest of the story to find out. Also you could go here. The original Irish tale is a reworking of the King Midas myth.

By: Elimare

Elimare — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 13:44:55 +0000

Everyone knows that Lowry Longseach has horses ears?

WELL I BLOODY DON’T.

By: Is

Is — Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:06:27 +0000

Aaaaaah - too short! I want more.
Bring on December.

Anyway, I love the sacks too - and that MacNessa told him to sit on them but wouldn’t himself.

By: Donal

Donal — Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:54:36 +0000

Yes, I suffer from many a lazy shorthand in my writing and one of them is for big sacks of foul, unidentifiable, things. I don’t know what’s in them yet. Possibly matter or handily indescribable filth.

By: Neil Struthers

Neil Struthers — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:37:21 +0000

This looks like it’s going to be fun.

What’s in the sacks then? Hmm, hmm? Very bad things by the smell of it.